Meanwhile women who get pregnant without the ability or desire to take care of a child give a bad name to the rest of us. I personally want two kids, one boy and one girl, and one of those adopted, but I know that if I get pregnant before I’m ready, I better put that child up for adoption.

However the point I made stands.  Severely disabled women having child after child simply trying to get one right is one of the greatest marks of irresponsibility there is.  It also as someone else on Digg pointed out makes a good legal case for child endangerment.

Really, when you talk about “Reproductive Responsibilities” you should be talking about people that are not disabled not living up to the responsibility that comes along with having children. Those people are the ones costing us millions and millions of dollars. Not the disabled.

Charles Lumias last blog post..The Best Bands That You Don’t Know: Aloha

I am not disagreeing that there was male involvement, or I hope to hell there was because any fertility clinic providing her services would be so far out of line I don’t even have words for it.  The sperm donor certainly has a responsibility to the children after they are born, but none up until that point.

This is why I am not overly sure there should be a legal right to reproduce, because it doesn’t cross the gender line.  If legal reproductive rights carried over to the man, he would be completely justified in insisting she have an abortion or that he shouldn’t have to financially support the child.  Since we can’t do that, it is obvious the right does not transcend to us.  If the right was equalaby the same token a woman would be able to tell the man who forbids her to have an abortion, fine you are completely responsible for the child after it is born and be able to legally walk away from both of them.

Not that it matters really there is a good chance the father(s) of these children is probably fetish minded.  Disabled girls are a big one I am at a loss to explain.