<p> Privacy Policy for bradstinyworld.com.com</p>
<p> The privacy of our visitors to bradstinyworld.com.com is important to us. </p>
<p> At bradstinyworld.com.com, we recognize that privacy of your personal information is important. Here is information on what types of personal information we receive and collect when you use visit bradstinyworld.com.com, and how we safeguard your information.  We never sell your personal information to third parties.</p>
<p> Log Files<br>
As with most other websites, we collect and use the data contained in log files.  The information in the log files include your IP (internet protocol) address, your ISP (internet service provider, such as AOL or Shaw Cable), the browser you used to visit our site (such as Internet Explorer or Firefox), the time you visited our site and which pages you visited throughout our site. </p>
<p> Cookies and Web Beacons<br>
We do use cookies to store information, such as your personal preferences when you visit our site.  This could include only showing you a popup once in your visit, or the ability to login to some of our features, such as forums.</p>
<p> We also use third party advertisements on bradstinyworld.com.com to support our site.  Some of these advertisers may use technology such as cookies and web beacons when they advertise on our site, which will also send these advertisers (such as Google through the Google AdSense program) information including your IP address, your ISP , the browser you used to visit our site, and in some cases, whether you have Flash installed.  This is generally used for geotargeting purposes (showing New York real estate ads to someone in New York, for example) or showing certain ads based on specific sites visited (such as showing cooking ads to someone who frequents cooking sites).</p>
<p> You can chose to disable or selectively turn off our cookies or third-party cookies in your browser settings, or by managing preferences in programs such as Norton Internet Security.  However, this can affect how you are able to interact with our site as well as other websites.  This could include the inability to login to services or programs, such as logging into forums or accounts.</p>
<p> AdSense Privacy Policy Provided by <a href=”http://www.hartblognetwrok.net”>Hart Blog Network</a></p>

We have gone too far this time in niche laws and micro niche terminology.  NFL player Charles Grant, of New Orleans Saints, has been arrested and charged with feticide.  That means he is being charged with killing both a woman and her fetus.  The laws have gone too far.

Is it more of a crime to kill a woman than it is a pregnant woman? Do we really need an extra crime with different penalties?  Do we really need to make up shit just to impress the media?  Fact, this idiot was involved in a gunfight, whether he did the actual shooting or not, and this woman is dead.  Why do we need so many extra laws when the people who make them have a hard enough time abiding by the ones we had?

The fact is I know what this law is on the book and I dislike it even more than most, extra laws.  This law exists for anti-abortion activists who hope and dream of one day charging doctors with murder.  These are usually the same people who coincidentally say the government shouldn’t be interfering in people’s lives. Of course they only mean theirs and only when it comes to paying taxes or providing welfare for other people.

Aside from this being a niche law put into effect to satisfy someone’s constituents it also puts us in a very slippery situation.  If we are to define a fetus as a person and child in their own right, we must apply the law evenly across the board.  Pregnant women who drink or smoke are abusing their children.  Pregnant women employed in potentially dangerous environments would be guilty of child endangerment; this includes waitresses who might be around a lot of second hand smoke.  Miscarriages for any number of reasons could make a woman guilty of negligent homicide.

Not only are the serious crimes potential landmines, but the ones where the data is questionable could lead to all sorts of legal implications.  If a pregnant woman and those they interact with don’t do everything every study says is beneficial they would be guilty of at least neglect or violating the fetus’s human rights and dignity.  Imagine telling your boss he must now address your expanding belly as a person because you are both employed here now.  Imagine the battle over some women not putting headphones on the bulge to introduce music.  Imaging the battle if you play it AC/DC over Bach?

If any of that sounds silly then the entire notion of a law giving legal personhood to a fetus should too.